United States v. Lorenzo Trevino

59 F.3d 177 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lorenzo TREVINO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-10334. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 6, 1995. * Decided June 12, 1995. Before: O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Lorenzo Trevino appeals his conviction, following entry of a conditional guilty plea, to possession with intent to distribute marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841 (a)(1) and (b)(1)(C). Trevino contends the district court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence seized from his vehicle because police officers lacked: 1) reasonable suspicion to justify the investigatory stop of Trevino's vehicle; and 2) probable cause to search the vehicle. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm. 3 We review the district court's decision on a motion to suppress de novo and the its factual findings for clear error. United States v.…