Rapp

Rapp v. United States

Good Law
146 F.2d 548·1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 2328
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 22, 1944No. 10677California1,308 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Denman, J.

Appellant Marcia Rapp, also known as Sally Stanford, appeals from a judgment holding her guilty of six acts of criminal contempt in charging and receiving from six tenants of a dwelling owned by her at 829 Bush Street, San Francisco, rentals of $75 per month each, whereas their rent had been $55 per month each, as determined by a Rent Regulation for Housing, issued pursuant to the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942 as amended, 50 U.S. C.A.Appendix § 901 et seq., each in violation of a preliminary injunction of the District Court restraining her from making such charges. The case was tried without a jury. On each of three of the violations she was sentenced to 30 days’ imprisonment, the sentences to run concurrently. On three others she was fined $500 each, a total of $1,500.

The violated injunction was issued in an action in that court and served on appellant. Its validity is not questioned here, nor is the collecting of the $75 per month rents by appellant’s agents.

The court was advised of eight claimed violations of the injunction by a request for prosecution by the Price Administrator detailing them under the letters A to H, inclusive, and by the affidavit of William R.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.