Lack

Lack v. Western Loan & Building Co.

Good Law
146 F.2d 852·1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 4161
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 30, 1944No. 10730California411 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Mathews, J.

In Lack v. Western Loan & Building Co., 9 Cir., 134 F.2d 1017 , we reversed, in part, a judgment of the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of California and remanded the case to that court with directions to enter judgment awarding to Western $19,250 of the $28,-067.87 which had been deposited in the .registry of the court by Pearl Assurance Company, Limited, awarding to Lack the balance ($8,817.87) of the $28,067.87, and requiring Western to convey certain property to Lack.

Our mandate was issued on May 29, 1943, and was filed in the District Court on June 3, 1943. That court did not enter judgment as directed by our mandate and, so far as the record shows, was not requested by either party to enter such judgment. Instead of requesting such entry of judgment, Lack requested the court to enter an interlocutory decree and on July 12, 1943, submitted to the court a proposed form of interlocutory decree. On September 15, 1943, he withdrew that form and proposed another form of interlocutory decree.

On December 20, 1943, the District Court entered an interlocutory decree entitled “Interlocutory Decree Pursuant to Mandate of the Circuit Court of Appeals.”…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.