Taylor

Taylor v. Bowles

Good Law
147 F.2d 824·1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 2202
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 17, 1945No. 10509California5,529 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Stephens, J.

Stanley Taylor, Isabelle D. Taylor and Evelyn Flynn, appeal from a final judgment of the United States District Court, restraining them from violating Maximum Rent Regulation No. 28, issued under the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, 56 Stat. 23 , 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 901 et seq., hereinafter called the Act. 1 , 2 This appeal is also from an order adjudging .ap *827 pellant, Stanley Taylor, in contempt of court for violation of a temporary restraining order issued in the same action, The appellants, Stanley W. Taylor and Isabelle D. Taylor, are the owners of an apartment house at 530 Larkin Street, San *828 Francisco, California, and the appellant, Evelyn Flynn, is the manager thereof.

The Price Administrator filed under Section 205(a) of the Emergency Price Control Act a complaint against the appellants, charging them under counts 1, 3 and 4 thereof with having violated Maximum Rent Regulation 28 as follows: (a) By demanding and receiving higher rents for the apartments than those permitted by the Regulation; . (b) by evicting and attempting to evict certain tenants from the apartments, notwithstanding the fact that under the Act the tenants were lawfully entitled to remain…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.