Cain

Cain v. United States

Good Law
148 F.2d 182·1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 2419
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 9, 1945No. 10990California1,076 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Wilbur, J.

Appellants apply to this court for an order fixing bail pending appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. A similar application was made to the judge of the District Court before whom the criminal proceedings were had and the following order was made by the trial court on February 17, 1945: “The defendants, Newman and Cain, were present in custody of the United States Marshal; Leslie Gillen, Esq., S. E. Sheffey, Esq., and Fred McDonald, Esq., were present on behalf of the defendants, Newmon, Cain, Files and Shaffer; William Licking AUSA, was present on behalf of U.S. After hearing the attorneys for the respective parties, it is Ordered that the bonds on appeal be fixed as follows : Newman, $20,000; Cain, $20,000; Files, $5,-000; Shaffer, $5,000; said bonds to contain a supersedeas clause.”

The applicants complain particularly of the requirement that the bond fixed by the court required it to contain a supersedeas clause which they contend would require the sureties to 'pay the fine of $10,000 each which was levied against the defendants and that it is impossible for them to secure sureties who will agree to such a bond.

The rules of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.