National Labor Relations Board v. Whiting-Mead Co.

Good Law
148 F.2d 817·16 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 608·1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 3239
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 28, 1945No. 10788California321 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

There is sufficient evidence in the record to support the National Labor Relations Board’s findings that respondent has violated the provisions of Sections 8(1), 8 (2), 8(3) and 8(5) of the National Labor Relations Act, Act of July 5, 1935, c. 372, 49 Stat. 449 , 29 U.S.C. Supp. V, Sec. 151 et seq., 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq.

There is evidence of certain offers by respondent to reinstate one or more of the five employees for which reinstatement and payments of lost compensation are provided in the order of which the Board seeks our enforcement. We therefore (1) order paragraph (c) of section 2 of the Board’s order modified to read (c) Offer to James W. Cowan, W. R. Greenwood, C. P. Swanson, August Scheiffel.e, Jr., and Helen Woods immediate and full reinstatement to their former or substantially equivalent positions without prejudice to their seniority and other rights and privileges, except as to any such persons to whom such an offer heretofore may have been made; (2) order paragraph (d) of section 2 of the Board’s order modified to read (d) Make whole said James W. Cow-an, W. R. Greenwood, C. P. Swanson, August Scheiffele, Jr., and Helen Woods for any loss of pay they may have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.