Pitrat

Pitrat v. Garlikov

Good Law
153 F.2d 224
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 5, 1993No. 90-15252California635 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Choy, J.

ORDER

Appellee Fogler’s petition for rehearing is granted and the orders filed December 21, 1992 are withdrawn. This Order does not affect the withdrawal of the October 25, 1991 opinion, 947 F.2d 419 , and dissenting opinion.

OPINION

Ronald S. Garlikov and James Flindall filed voluntary petitions for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 7 of the bankruptcy code on April 29, 1988. Reda S. Garlikov filed a similar petition on June 1,1988. Ronald and Reda Garlikov (Garlikov) are husband and wife. Their cases were consolidated for joint administration.

Garlikov and Flindall (the Bankrupts) claimed that their interests in certain pension plans were either excludable from their respective bankruptcy estates or exempt from the claims of their creditors. GarlikoVs interest in these plans was approximately $1,200,000. FlindaH’s interest in these plans was approximately $1,800,000. Claude Pi-trat, as the bankruptcy trustee for Garlikov, and Stanley Fogler, as the bankruptcy trustee for Flindall (trustees), objected to the Bankrupts’ claims of exclusion and exemption. The bankruptcy court consolidated the Bankrupts’ cases for the limited purpose of determining the status of their pension…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.