Bowles

Bowles v. Quon

Good Law
154 F.2d 72·1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 2019
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 12, 1946No. 11105California705 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Garrecht, J.

An appeal as this one from a judgment denying an injunction ordinarily brings up nothing for review but the question of whether the trial court’s discretion was plainly abused.

The lower court found that between July 3, 1944, and July 28, 1944, in violation of Section 2.8 of General Ration Order No. 8, of paragraphs (a) and (d) (1) and (3) of Section 10.5 of Ration Order No. 16 and paragraphs (a) and (c) (1) and (3) of *73 Section 9.5 of Ration Order No. 13, 1 appellees sold to R. D. Sikes, operator of the Nanking Cafe at El Centro, California, various rationed meats without obtaining the established point values therefor. At the time of trial a balance of 2397 points was still owed the appellees.

The lower court also found that between the 1st and 15th day of August, 1944, appellees purchased butter from the Golden State Co., Ltd., and violated the provisions of Section 2.8 of General Ration Order No. 8 and paragraphs (1) and (3) of Section 10.5 of Ration Order No. 16 in that appellees failed to surrender the 2400 points due for the butter until August 25, 1944.

Further, the lower court found appellees displayed and offered for sale on August 9, 1944, fourteen items of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.