Pillsbury

Liberty Mut. Ins. v. Pillsbury

Good Law
154 F.2d 559·11 Cal. Comp. Cases 111·1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 3201
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 18, 1946No. 11094California279 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Mathews, J.

In the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of California, appellants (Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Contractors Pacific Naval Air Bases) instituted a proceeding against appellees (Warren II. Pillsbury, Deputy Commissioner, of the United States Employees’ Compensation Commission, and Walter L. Wood) under § 21 of the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C.A. § 921 . The proceeding was instituted by the filing of a libel, which subsequently was amended. Appellee Pillsbury moved to dismiss the amended libel. The motion was heard on December 11, 1944. There was no other hearing. On December 26, 1944, the following “order,” signed by a judge of the District Court, was filed and entered: “It is ordered that the motion of respondent [appellee], Warren H. Pillsbury, to dismiss the amended libel for mandatory injunction filed herein be and the same is hereby granted, and said amended libel is hereby dismissed.”

The “order” of December 26, 1944, was a final decision, within the meaning of § 128(a) of the Judicial Code, 28 U.S.C.A. § 225 (a), and hence was appealable, but no appeal was taken therefrom. On February 21, 1945, the judge…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.