Securities & Exchange Commission v. Penfield Co.

Good Law
157 F.2d 65·1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 3823
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 25, 1946No. 11173California752 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Denman, J.

This is an appeal by the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereinafter called the Commission, from an order of the district court made on the motion of the Commission which, though it held appellee Young, an officer of the Penfield Company, in contempt for failing to comply with an order to produce documents for the inspection of the Commission’s examiner and fined Young $50.00, failed to enforce the disobeyed order by committing Young unless he complied. Young paid the fine. The motion and order were made-in the same proceeding in which the disobeyed order was made. Penfield Co. v. Securities and Exchange Commission, 9 Cir., 143 F.2d 746 . It is an appealable order. Clarke v. Federal Trade Commission, 9 Cir., 128 F.2d 542, 543 .

Young did not appeal from the order holding him in contempt. That decision is final and the only question before us is the extent of the remedy to which the Commission is entitled.

Appellees contend that there is no obligation on the district court to commit Young until he has complied with the court’s order because it is discretionary with that court either to fine or to imprison and that, since Young has paid the fine, the case is moot. We do not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.