United States v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.

Good Law
157 F.2d 902·35 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 339·35 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 339·1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 3338
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 4, 1946No. 11211California2,339 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Mathews, J.

For the years 1937, 1938, 1939 and 1940, excise taxes aggregating $33,062.45 were paid 1 by appellee, Pacific Electric *903 Railway Company, a corporation, to Nat Rogan, Collector of Internal Revenue for the Sixth Collection District of California. Alleging that the taxes were erroneously collected, appellee claimed a refund and, its claim having been denied, brought a suit for the recovery of the taxes. Rogan having died, the suit was brought against appellant, the United States. 2 Appellant answered, a trial was had, an opinion was filed, 3 and a judgment was entered in appellee’s favor. From that judgment this appeal is prosecuted.

The taxes were collected under what is now subchapter B (§§ 1500-1537) of chapter 9 of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S. C.A.Int.Rev.Code, §§ 1500-1537, 4 the pertinent provisions of which are found in §§ 1520 and 1532.

Section 1520 provides: “In addition to other taxes, every employer shall pay an excise tax, with respect to having individuals in his employ, equal to [specified] percentages of so much of the compensation as is not in excess of $300 for any calendar month paid.by him to any employee for services rendered to him .after December 31,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.