Rise v. State of Oregon

Caution
59 F.3d 1556·95 Daily Journal DAR 9438·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17265·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5535
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 18, 199593-35521California8,952 words

Opinion

Opinion

59 F.3d 1556 64 USLW 2115 , 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5535 , 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9438 Erik C. RISE; David R. Durham; Jeffery F. Rhodes; David A. English; and Michael Milligan, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. STATE OF OREGON; Fred Pearce; Director, Department of Corrections; Department of State Police; Reginald B. Madsen, Superintendent, Department of State Police; Catherine Knox, Administrator, DOC Health Services Department; and John Does 1-25, DOC employees implementing Chapter 669, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-35521. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 2, 1994. Decided July 18, 1995. Jeff Dominic Price, Los Angeles, CA, for plaintiffs-appellants. Robert Atkinson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, OR, for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon. Before: FLETCHER, NELSON and RYMER, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge FLETCHER; Dissent by Judge D.W. NELSON. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge: 1 The plaintiffs in this 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 suit appeal the district court's summary judgment dismissing their claims. We have jurisdiction and affirm. 2 * Chapter 669, Oregon Laws 1991, O.R.S. Secs. 137.076, 161.325(4),…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.