Spink v. Lockheed Corporation

60 F.3d 616 68 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 625 , 64 USLW 2088 , 19 Employee Benefits Cas. 1648 , 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5541 , 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9429 , Pens. Plan Guide P 23911I Paul L. SPINK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOCKHEED CORPORATION; Daniel M. Tellep; Robert A. Furman; Vincent N. Marafino; K.H. Anderson; L. Bernard; R.W. Berry; P.N. Braun-Agel; D.L. Bronco; R.H. Northcutt; W.E. Skowronski; A.G. Van Shaick; W.T. Vincent, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-56094. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 1, 1994. Decided July 18, 1995. Theresa M. Traber, Bert Voorhees, Traber & Voorhees, Pasadena, CA, for plaintiff-appellant. Gordon E. Krischer, David E. Gordon, Paul Borden, O'Melveny & Myers, Los Angeles, CA, for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before: D.W. NELSON, REINHARDT, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. BRUNETTI, Circuit Judge: 1 Paul Spink filed a complaint on behalf of himself and similarly situated individuals against Lockheed Corporation and certain individual defendants (collectively "Lockheed"). Spink alleged that Lockheed's retirement plan violated the…