Native Americans Enola v. Forest Service

60 F.3d 645 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5687 NATIVE AMERICANS for ENOLA; Cascade Geographic Society; Friends of Enola Hill; Rip Lone Wolf, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. U.S. FOREST SERVICE, Defendant-Appellee, and Caffall Bros. Forest Products, Inc.; and Ray Schoppert Logging, Inc., an Oregon corporation, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellees. No. 93-36130. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 10, 1995. Decided July 21, 1995. 1 William C. Carpenter, Jr., Eugene, OR, and C. Peter Sorenson, Eugene, OR, for plaintiffs-appellants. 2 Elizabeth S. Merritt, Associate Gen. Counsel, Nat. Trust for Historic Preservation in the U.S., Washington, DC, for amicus curiae. 3 Jacques B. Gelin, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, for defendant-appellee. 4 Thomas J. Greif, Portland, OR, for defendants-intervenors-appellees. 5 Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon. 6 Before: GOODWIN and HUG, Circuit Judges, and SCHWARZER, * District Judge. 7 Native Americans for Enola, et al., appeal the district court's decision that the Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture ("Forest Service"), did not violate Section 106 of the National…