Bonham

Bonham v. CHI YAN CHAM LOUIE

Good Law
166 F.2d 15·1948 U.S. App. LEXIS 2300
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 11, 1948No. 11551California741 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Denman, J.

This is an attempted appeal from a judgment admitting appellee to citizenship. In the district court the United States appeared and opposed appellee’s petition. One R. P. Bonham, as District Director of Immigration and Naturalization at Seattle, Washington, in his own name as such officer filed within time a notice of appeal. The question we, sua sponte, are required to determine is whether such a District Director has been empowered by Congress to take such action on behalf of the sovereign in his own name as appellant.

The District Director’s notice of appeal was filed on February 14, 1947. Over ten months later the United States appears here and contends that the District Director has such power and moves that it be substituted for him as appellant. The United States also has filed a stipulation of the appellee that the United States so be substituted as appellant and that the appeal be heard on its merits.

*16 It is obvious that appellee’s stipulation for an attack on the judgment favorable to him will not confer jurisdiction on this court if no appeal has been taken by the United States.

The executive organization placed the administration of the immigration laws in the…

Concurring Opinion

Stephens, J.

(concurring).

I concur in the result

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.