Woods

Woods v. Rose

Good Law
171 F.2d 290·1948 U.S. App. LEXIS 2825
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 17, 1948No. 11928California357 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

On April 18, 1947, Philip B. Fleming, Administrator of the Office of Price Controls, 1 brought an action on behalf of the United States against appellee, Pearl Rose, under § 205(a) and (e) of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, as amended, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 925(a) and (e), for the violation of rent regulations issued under § 2 of the Act, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 902.

On April 23, 1947, Administrator Fleming’s functions with respect to rent control were transferred to Frank 'R. Creedon, Housing Expediter, 2 who moved for the substitution of himself as plaintiff in Fleming’s place and stead. That motion was made and denied on September 9, 1947.

Thereupon appellee moved to dismiss the action. Indicating that that motion would be granted, the court, on September 9, 1947, directed appellee’s counsel to prepare a “form of dismissal,” meaning, obviously, a form of judgment dismissing the action.

On December 3, 1947, appellant, Tighe E. Woods, who had succeeded Creedon as Housing Expediter, moved for the substitution of himself as plaintiff in Fleming’s place and stead. That motion was granted on March 17, 1948. Before granting it, however, the court, on February 10, 1947,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.