Brinkley v. Skjonsberg

60 F.3d 832 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ralph BRINKLEY, and Lawrence Brinkley, as minor son, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Evelyn SKJONSBERG; Katrinka Brinkley; John Quinn; Maurice M. Epstein, and King County; Boulder City Police Department, Boulder Township; and Boulder City; Sandra Saltskill, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-16625. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 26, 1995. * Decided July 3, 1995. Before: O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ralph Brinkley, suing on behalf of himself and his minor son, appeals pro se the district court's: (1) dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 against Judge John Quinn, Magistrate Maurice Epstein, the City of Boulder City, his ex-wife, Katrinka and numerous other private individuals, and (2) denial of his motion for default judgment. We review de novo the district court's dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), Oscar v. University Students Co-op. Ass'n, 965…