Aja Zanna Ali-Bukar v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
60 F.3d 832·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 25444
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 10, 199594-70675California1,529 words

Opinion

Opinion

60 F.3d 832 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Aja Zanna ALI-BUKAR, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 94-70675. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 7, 1995. Decided July 10, 1995. Petition to Review a Decision of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, I&NS No. Afl-wmj-pzo. INS VACATED. MEMORANDUM * Before: BROWNING, BOOCHEVER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 * Aja Zanna Ali-Bukar, a native and citizen of Nigeria, petitions for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("the BIA" or "the Board") affirming the decision of the immigration judge ("IJ") denying his application for withholding of deportation and asylum pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Secs. 1253 (h) and 1158(a). The BIA based its denial entirely on its finding of adverse credibility. Because this finding is not based on substantial evidence, we grant the petition, vacate the order and remand to the BIA for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.