Birdwell v. Flanagan
Opinion
Opinion
60 F.3d 832 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ronald Dale BIRDWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. W. T. FLANAGAN, Detective Sergeant Badge # M-14; Mohave County, Mohave County Board of Supervisors; Steve Conn, Judge, and Gary Pope, Judge, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-15154. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 26, 1995. * Decided July 3, 1995. Before: O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 California state prisoner Ronald Dale Birdwell appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action alleging civil rights violations in connection with his narcotics convictions by Mohave County, Arizona; County Detective Sergeant W.T. Flanagan; the County Board of Supervisors; and County Superior Court Judges Steve Conn and Gary Pope. 3 We affirm the district court's dismissal of the claims against Judges Conn and Pope based on absolute judicial immunity. See Mireles v. Waco, 112 S.Ct. 286 (1991). To…