Crecsencio Aguayo-Gonzalez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
60 F.3d 832·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 25436
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 5, 199594-70054California1,262 words

Opinion

Opinion

60 F.3d 832 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Crecsencio AGUAYO-GONZALEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-70054. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 8, 1995. Decided July 5, 1995. Petition for Review of a Decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals, INS NO. Aqa-xrs-blv. BIA GRANTED IN PART, DENIED IN PART, REMANDED. Before: FLETCHER, WIGGINS, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Crescencio Aguayo-Gonzalez appeals a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his petition for review of an immigration judge's finding that he was deportable and ineligible for discretionary relief from deportation. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1105 (a). We grant in part, deny in part and remand. BACKGROUND 3 Aguayo entered the United States illegally in 1981. On May 4, 1988, he applied for amnesty under the Immigration Reform and Control Act…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.