William T. Brady James Cardwell Dar-Kel Corporation v. Chester P. Brown Maria De Los Angeles Castelazo De Brown Lorna Brown De Mena

Good Law
60 F.3d 832·1995 WL 394242·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 25456
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 30, 199594-56639California1,031 words

Opinion

Opinion

60 F.3d 832 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. William T. BRADY; James Cardwell; Dar-Kel Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Chester P. BROWN; Maria De Los Angeles Castelazo De Brown; Lorna Brown De Mena, Defendants-Appellants. No. 94-56639. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 26, 1995. * Decided June 30, 1995. Before: O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Chester P. Brown, pro se, and Maria De Los Angeles Castelazo De Brown and Lorna Brown De Mena, represented by attorney Darrell L. Johnson (collectively "the Browns"), appeal the district court's May 3, 1994 order requiring them to execute new powers of attorney and to send various letters regarding previous powers of attorney. "A district court's grant of permanent injunctive relief is reviewed for an abuse of discretion or application of erroneous legal principles." Dexter v. Kirschner, 984 F.2d 979, 982 (9th Cir. 1993). We have jurisdiction pursuant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.