Plomb Tool Co. v. Fayette R. Plumb, Inc.

Good Law
171 F.2d 945·80 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 123·1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 4583
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 13, 1949No. 12101California507 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Stephens, J.

Both parties to the above case are manufacturers of tools, and the plaintiff brought an action in the district court to enjoin the defendant from certain uses of the word “Plomb” in the making and marketing of such tools. The litigation resulted in a consent decree being made and entered against defendant under and out of which an injunction was decreed in which defendant was enjoined from certain defined uses of the word “Plomb.”

*946 Thereafter the plaintiff petitioned for relief by the same court for alleged violations of the injunction to which reference has just been made and for a judgment of contempt of court against defendant for such violations. Plaintiff also sought an accounting and allowance of costs and attorney fees. After hearing, the court granted the petition and appointed a special master to take evidence on plaintiff’s loss of profits and damages caused by the violation of the injunction. Thereafter defendant made a motion to the district court, based upon the papers in the case and affidavits, petitioning “ * * * the Court for an order suspending and staying, pending the appeal herein and upon such terms as the court may see fit to impose, the enforcement of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.