Carlos Humberto Aguirre-Colindres v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

60 F.3d 832 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Carlos Humberto AGUIRRE-COLINDRES, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 90-70192. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 7, 1995. Decided June 30, 1995. Petition to Review a Decision of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, I&NS No. Aks-xjo-eri. I.N.S. PETITION DENIED. Before: BROWNING, BOOCHEVER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Because we held in Aguirre-Colindres' appeal, No. 94-35798, that he is not entitled to de novo adjudication of his asylum application, pursuant to the settlement agreement in American Baptist Churches v. Thornburgh, 760 F. Supp. 796 (N.D. Cal. 1991), we review the BIA's decision to determine whether it erred in denying Aguirre-Colindres' application for asylum and hold that it did not. A. Aguirre-Colindres' Drug Convictions 3 The BIA did not consider Aguirre-Colindres' drug convictions…