Elmira Izmailova v. St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center, Psychiatric Unit, Clark-8 Unit

Good Law
60 F.3d 833·1995 WL 266763·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 25484
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 5, 199593-56489California659 words

Opinion

Opinion

60 F.3d 833 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Elmira IZMAILOVA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ST. LUKE'S-ROOSEVELT HOSPITAL CENTER, Psychiatric Unit, Clark-8 Unit, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-56489. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 2, 1995. * Decided May 5, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Elmira Izmailova appeals pro se the district court's order denying her leave to file her medical malpractice action against St. Luke's Roosevelt Hospital Center ("St. Luke's") without prepayment of fees. The district court denied the in forma pauperis request because it found no basis for federal jurisdiction. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We vacate and remand. 3 Sec. 401(3). The district court originally sentenced Aldridge to o two years probation on each count, to run concurrently. As a condition of probation under 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3563 (b)(12), the court required Aldridge to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.