Douglas K. Kuroda v. The Hertz Corporation International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 431

60 F.3d 833 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Douglas K. KURODA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The HERTZ CORPORATION; International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 431, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-16922. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 26, 1995. * Decided June 30, 1995. Before: O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Douglas K. Kuroda appeals pro se the district court's grant of defendants' motion for summary judgment on his claims of race discrimination, breach of the duty of fair representation, and breach of the duty to provide a fair arbitration. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 * Background 4 On March 2, 1993, Kuroda and his supervisor had a heated verbal exchange during which Kuroda told his supervisor, "You may have a Master's degree but you don't know shit." Kuroda's supervisor instructed him to "punch out" and leave the premises. Kuroda protested that he had work to…