Johnson v. Contra Costa County Sheriff's Dept.

Good Law
60 F.3d 833·1995 WL 392158·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 25466
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 3, 199593-16675California626 words

Opinion

Opinion

60 F.3d 833 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Le Roi JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; Coleman Fanin, Julie Graham, Richard Hale, Contra Costa County, Lee Aldridge, Carolyn Keim, Rose Wolf and Herbert Kerlinger, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-16675. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 26, 1995. * Decided July 3, 1995. Appeal from the United States District Court, for the Northern District of California, D.C. No. CV-86-4975-DLJ; D. Lowell Jensen, District Judge, Presiding. N.D.Cal., AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED AND REMANDED IN PART. Before: O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Le Roi Johnson, a former California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 claim and the dismissal of his habeas claim. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and affirm in part, and vacate and remand in part. A. Section 1983…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.