Michael C. Marino v. Fred Meyer, Inc.

60 F.3d 833 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Michael C. MARINO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FRED MEYER, INC., Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-35596. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 26, 1995 * Decided July 3, 1995. Before: O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Michael C. Marino appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of Fred Meyer, Inc. ("Meyer") in his employment discrimination action alleging gender discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e et seq. Marino contends the district court erred by: (1) finding that he failed to raise a genuine issue of material fact as to discriminatory treatment or sexual harassment; (2) failing to notify him of the requirements for responding to a motion for summary judgment; and (3) denying his motions to compel discovery and for amendment of the findings and a new trial. 1 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28…