Timothy J. Gawron v. Kurt McAllister Peter Ritter

Good Law
60 F.3d 833·1995 WL 398905·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 25461
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 7, 199594-35556California1,424 words

Opinion

Opinion

60 F.3d 833 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Timothy J. GAWRON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kurt McALLISTER; Peter Ritter, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-35556. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 6, 1995. * Decided July 7, 1995. Before: FLETCHER, KOZINSKI, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Idaho state prisoner Timothy J. Gawron appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment and dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action against Boise Police Officers Peter Ritter and Kurt McAllister. Gawron alleged that Ritter and McAllister violated his Fourth Amendment rights when (1) Ritter detained and searched him during a traffic stop of a vehicle in which he was a passenger and (2) McAllister illegally searched his residence and seized property pursuant to an allegedly defective search warrant. As a result, Gawron was charged and pled guilty to burglary and grand theft. 3 We review de novo a district court's summary judgment.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.