Leslie Holst v. State Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Ex Rel. Nevada Division of Forestry, Leslie Holst James Parsons Mark Lathrop Charles Perkins, Plaintiffs-Appellents v. State Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Ex Rel. Nevada Division of Forestry

Good Law
60 F.3d 833
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 24, 199593-17234California809 words

Opinion

Opinion

60 F.3d 833 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Leslie HOLST, et al., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES, ex rel. NEVADA DIVISION OF FORESTRY, Defendant-Appellant. Leslie HOLST; James Parsons; Mark Lathrop; Charles Perkins, Plaintiffs-Appellents, v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES, ex rel. NEVADA DIVISION OF FORESTRY, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 93-17234, 93-17260. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submission deferred April 20, 1995. Resubmitted May 11, 1995. * Decided May 24, 1995. Before: THOMPSON, TROTT and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Leslie Holst and three other Nevada firefighters appeal the judgment entered following a jury trial in their Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) action against their employer the Nevada Division of Forestry (NDF). The NDF cross-appeals the attorney fee awarded to the plaintiffs. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.