Jose Londono v. U.S. Customs Service Drug Enforcement Administration

60 F.3d 833 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jose LONDONO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. U.S. CUSTOMS SERVICE; Drug Enforcement Administration, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-56284. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 6, 1995. * Decided July 7, 1995. As Amended Aug. 10, 1995. Before: FLETCHER, KOZINSKI and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jose Londono appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his action against the Drug Enforcement Administration ("DEA"), the United States Customs Service ("Customs"), Attorney General Janet Reno, District Director of Customs Rudy M. Camacho, and Director of the DEA John C. Lawn. Londono brought this action under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. Sec. 702 , the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. Secs. 2671-2680 , and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) seeking the return of $8,799 confiscated by Customs agents on August 28,…