Hunter v. Gomez

60 F.3d 833 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Joseph Scott HUNTER; Jesse Dale Hernandez, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. James H. GOMEZ, Director of Corrections; Jack R. Reagan, Inmate Appeals; Theo White, Warden; J. C. Walkley, Program Administrator; J. P. Walker, Program Lieutenant, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-15208. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 26, 1995. * Decided June 30, 1995. Before: O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 California state prisoners Joseph Scott Hunter and Jesse Dale Hernandez (collectively "Appellants") appeal pro se the district court's dismissal of their 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action as frivolous. 1 The Appellants alleged that because of their assigned work status their access to the prison yard was restricted in violation of their constitutional rights. We review dismissals pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915 (d) for abuse of discretion. Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 33-34 (1992).…