Schroeder v. Kaplan

Good Law
60 F.3d 834·1995 WL 398878·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 25499
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 7, 199593-17123California2,025 words

Opinion

Opinion

60 F.3d 834 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Eric SCHROEDER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gary KAPLAN, HMSF Residency Section Supervisor; Daryl Directo, prison guard; Robert Johnson, prison guard; William Oku, former HCF Warden; Cinda Sandin, HHSF Residency Section Supervisor; Howard Apao, prison guard; Thomas Lau, prison guard; Roland Ahuna, prison guard; Allen Anduha, prison guard; Tara Harper, counselor; John Smythe, HCF Warden; and George Sumner, PSD Director, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-17123. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 6, 1995. * Decided July 7, 1995. Before: FLETCHER, KOZINSKI, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Eric Schroeder, a Hawaii state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's grant of defendants' motion for summary judgment based on a finding of qualified immunity in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 Government officials are entitled…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.