Adolfo Rousse-Rubio v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

60 F.3d 834 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Adolfo ROUSSE-RUBIO, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 94-70340. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 26, 1995. * Decided June 30, 1995. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals, INS No. Ani-doo-yxl. BIA PETITION DENIED. Before: O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Adolfo Rousse-Rubio, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") dismissal of his appeal from the Immigration Judge's ("IJ") denial of his application for suspension of deportation under 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1254 (a)(1) and denial of his motion to reopen. Rousse-Rubio contends that his 1986 deportation did not interrupt his continuous physical presence in the United States. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1105a(a), and we deny the petition. 3 Rousse-Rubio first entered the…