Arthur C. O'Hagan Michele M. O'Hagan v. The Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Company, Dba U.S. West Communications, Inc.

60 F.3d 834 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Arthur C. O'HAGAN; Michele M. O'Hagan, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH COMPANY, dba U.S. West Communications, Inc., Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-16968. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 26, 1995. * Decided July 3, 1995. Before: O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Arthur C. and Michele M. O'Hagan, Chapter 7 debtors, appeal pro se the district court's dismissal as moot of their appeal from the bankruptcy court's order authorizing the sale of a bankruptcy estate asset to U.S. West Communications, Inc. (U.S. West). The O'Hagans contend their appeal was not moot even though they failed to obtain a stay of the sale of the asset, an interest in their Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) action against U.S. West, because U.S. West's purchase was in bad faith. We affirm. 3 The failure to obtain a stay moots an appeal…