Ortiz v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
60 F.3d 834·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 25494
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 30, 199594-70274California770 words

Opinion

Opinion

60 F.3d 834 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Alejandro Jose ORTIZ, aka Alejandro Ortiz; Alejandra Mariela Ortiz, aka Alejandra M. Flores; Alejandra Del Socorro Ortiz. Petitioners, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 94-70274. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 26, 1995. * Decided June 30, 1995. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals, INS Nos. Aos-mie-jkt, Aic-tgz-lua and Acd-rah-vmp; BIA PETITION DENIED. Before: O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Alejandro Jose Ortiz, Alejandra Mariela Ortiz and Alejandra Del Socorro Ortiz ("petitioners"), natives and citizens of Nicaragua, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") decision denying the petitioners' motion to reopen deportation proceedings to apply for suspension of deportation under section 244(a)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, ("INA"), 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1254 (a)(1).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.