Michael E. Peterson v. Kathryn Bail George Johnson David L. Carlson Kaye Adkins Robert Trimble

Good Law
60 F.3d 834·1995 WL 398698·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 25487
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 7, 199594-36190California840 words

Opinion

Opinion

60 F.3d 834 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Michael E. PETERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kathryn BAIL; George Johnson; David L. Carlson; Kaye Adkins; Robert Trimble, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-36190. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 6, 1995. * Decided July 7, 1995. Before: FLETCHER, KOZINSKI and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Michael E. Peterson, a former Washington state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's grant of summary judgment for the defendants, members of the Washington Indeterminate Sentence Review Board ("parole board") in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. 1 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review de novo the district court's grant of summary judgment, International Union v. Karr, 994 F.2d 1426 , 1429 (9th Cir.1993), and we affirm. 2 3 Peterson contends that his due process rights were violated when he did not receive a second hearing before three armed robberies were…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.