Lawrence D. Ross v. Rockwell International Corporation

60 F.3d 834 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Lawrence D. ROSS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-55784. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 26, 1995. * Decided July 3, 1995. Before: O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Lawrence D. Ross appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment dismissal of his actions alleging race discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ("Title VII"), 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e et seq. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review de novo the district court's grant of summary judgment, Forsberg v. Pacific Northwest Bell Tel. Co., 840 F.2d 1409, 1413 (9th Cir. 1988), and we affirm. 3 To establish a prima facie case of intentional discrimination, the plaintiff must provide evidence "which gives rise to an inference of unlawful discrimination." Texas Dep't of Community Affairs v. Burdine, 450 U.S.…