Shearson Lehman Brothers Inc., Plaintiff-Apellee v. Herbert Leslie Greenberg, Defendant

60 F.3d 834 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. SHEARSON LEHMAN BROTHERS INC., Plaintiff-Apellee, v. Herbert Leslie GREENBERG, Defendant- Appellant. No. 93-55535. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 3, 1995. Before: GIBSON, * HUG, and POOLE, Circuit Judges. 1 Ben Suter, Julie Taylor, Keesal, Young & Logan, San Francisco, CA, for Shearson Lehman Brothers, Inc. 2 Herbert Leslie Greenberg, pro se. 3 MEMORANDUM ** 4 Appellant Greenberg appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of Shearson Lehman Brothers, Inc., in a lawsuit brought by Greenberg alleging misleading business practices and unfair competition by Shearson in violation of Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code Sec. 17200. We review the district court's grant of summary judgment de novo, Jesinger v. Nevada Federal Credit Union, 24 F.3d 1127, 1130 (9th Cir. 1994), and we affirm. I. 5 This action was initiated in California state court, but was subsequently…