Nanayakkara v. California State University, Fullerton By and Through Bd. of Trustees of California State University

60 F.3d 834 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Somapala NANAYAKKARA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, FULLERTON, By & Through BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF the CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY; Jewel P. Cobb; Jack Coleman; George Cohn; Young D. Kwon, Defendants - Appellees. No. 93-55874. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 4, 1995. * Decided June 1, 1995. 1 Before: BEEZER and TROTT, Circuit Judges, and SHUBB, ** District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Somapala Nanayakkara, a former associate professor at California State University at Fullerton ("CSUF"), appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of CSUF in his action brought under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act ("ADEA"), 29 U.S.C. Sec. 623 , and California state law. Nanayakkara alleges CSUF discriminated against him on the basis of race, color, national origin, and age, and committed breach of contract and fraud…