Sultan Mohammad Daud Roadwall v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Good Law
60 F.3d 834·1995 WL 398718·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 25502
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 5, 199593-70756California1,085 words

Opinion

Opinion

60 F.3d 834 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Sultan Mohammad Daud ROADWALL, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 93-70756. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 8, 1995. Decided July 5, 1995. Petition to Review a Decision of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, INS No. Ars-kej-euu. BIA PETITION GRANTED. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Petitioner Sultan Mohammad Daud Roadwall petitions this Court to review the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals, which dismissed his appeal of the Immigration Judge's finding that he was deportable as an alien convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude. We have jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1105a(a). We grant the petition for review and instruct the BIA to remand the matter to the IJ for further proceedings on Roadwall's request for discretionary relief. 3 Roadwall…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.