Robert T. Theede v. U. S. Veterans Administration
Opinion
Opinion
60 F.3d 835 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert T. THEEDE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. U. S. VETERANS ADMINISTRATION, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-15044. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 26, 1995. * Decided June 30, 1995. Before: O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Robert L. Theede appeals pro se the district court's: (1) dismissal of his complaint against the United States Veterans Administration, William L. Roberts, Wayne D. Thompson, Dean R. Stordahl, Ausma S. Blumenthal and Neal C. Lawson (the "VA defendants") as barred by res judicata; and (2) dismissal of the Department of Labor, Elizabeth Dole, Edward Derwinsk, and Clarence H. Nixon (the "Labor Department defendants") for failure to comply with a district court order. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 * Res Judicata 4 Theede contends that the district court erred by concluding that his action was…