United States v. Robert Lee Singleton

Good Law
60 F.3d 835·1995 WL 394355·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 25547
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 30, 199594-10586California246 words

Opinion

Opinion

60 F.3d 835 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Lee SINGLETON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-10586. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 26, 1995. * Decided June 30, 1995. Before: O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Robert L. Singleton appeals his 151-month sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines imposed following his guilty plea to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine. He contends that his waiver of the right to appeal in the plea agreement should not be enforced because he believed that he would receive a sentence closer to the ten-year minimum statutory term. We disagree. Singleton was sentenced at the low end of the applicable Sentencing Guidelines range in accordance with the terms of the plea agreement. Because the plea agreement was not breached, we uphold Singleton's waiver of his right to appeal. See United States v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.