United States v. Lee Roy Hannon, Jr.

60 F.3d 835 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lee Roy HANNON, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-10493. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 26, 1995. * July 3, 1995. Before: O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Lee Roy Hannon, Jr. appeals his sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines imposed following his guilty plea to eighteen counts of submitting a false claim upon the United States and aiding and abetting, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Secs. 287 and 2. Hannon contends that the district court erred in departing upward on the ground that Hannon's criminal history score did not adequately reflect the seriousness of his past criminal conduct. 3 The government argues that this appeal should be dismissed because Hannon waived his right to appeal in his plea agreement. We agree. We reject Hannon's contention that he did not waive his right to appeal the district…