United States v. Jorge Luis Rosales
Opinion
Opinion
60 F.3d 835 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Jorge Luis ROSALES, Defendant/Appellant. No. 93-30300. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 13, 1994. Decided July 5, 1995. Before: ALDISERT, * NORRIS and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jorge Luis Rosales appeals his sentence on a jury conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. Secs. 841 (a)(1) and 846, contending that the district court abused its discretion in denying his motion for discovery of the log books of the arresting trooper which might have demonstrated that the trooper stopped Rosales not to pursue him for a minor traffic violation but rather to search for drugs, that it erred in concluding that the trooper was not prohibited from asking Rosales to consent to a search of his car after the traffic citation was issued, and that it abused its…