United States v. Babatunde Oniorisan

60 F.3d 835 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Babatunde ONIORISAN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-50238. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 26, 1995. * Decided July 3, 1995. Before: O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Babatunde Oniorisan appeals his conviction following a jury trial for unlawful importation of heroin and possession with intent to distribute heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. Secs. 841 (a)(1) and 952(a). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), counsel for Oniorisan filed a brief stating that he finds no meritorious issues for review. Oniorisan's counsel also filed a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm the district court's judgment and grant counsel's motion to withdraw. 3 Oniorisan filed a pro se brief in which he contends that he received ineffective assistance of…