United States v. Jose Luis Ayala

60 F.3d 835 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Luis AYALA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-50370. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 26, 1995. * Decided July 3, 1995. Before: O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jose Luis Ayala appeals his conviction following his conditional guilty plea to possession of ammunition by a felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 922 (g)(1). He contends the district court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence because police officers detained him without reasonable suspicion. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review de novo whether an investigatory stop violated the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Garcia-Camacho, 53 F.3d 244, 245 (9th Cir. 1995). To detain a suspect, the police must have reasonable suspicion, or "specific, articulable facts which, together with objective and…