Fee

United States v. Fee

Good Law
174 F.2d 1020·1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 2319
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 18, 1949No. 12213California300 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

This matter is before the court on petition of the United States of America for a Writ of Mandamus, or other appropriate order, compelling and directing The Honorable James Alger Fee, United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, to rule upon a motion filed by the United States Attorney for the District of Oregon, together with Hugh F. O’Donnell, Special Assistant to the Attorney General of the United States, in a cause entitled Walker et al. v. Reynolds Metal Company, for leave to file a Representation of Interest on behalf of the United States of America, and to enter and file an order in conformity with his decision and directing him to proceed with the trial of the action at a date subsequent to the entry of the order by him on the motion of the United States for leave to file a Representation of Interest.

The respondent Judge, in his return to an order to show cause, has informed this court that he has the said motion under advisement and has not refused to rule thereon. Counsel for respondent Judge has represented to this court that said Judge "has stated he will rule at an appropriate time and before the interests of the government are prejudiced in any way”,…

Concurring Opinion

Stephens, J.

(concurring).

I concur. However, upon the statement of fact recited in the opinion, I would go further and deny and dismiss the petition.

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.