95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5900, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,130 Jack Cohen, on Behalf of Himself and All Other Similarly Situated, and Anthony Maniscalco, II v. Resolution Trust Corporation, in Its Capacity as Receiver for Imperial Savings Association, an Insured Depository Institution, A.K.A. Imperial Federal Savings Association, Jack Cohen, on Behalf of Himself and All Other Similarly Situated Mark Rozells, and Michael Lea v. Resolution Trust Corporation, in Its Capacity as Receiver for Imperial Savings Association, an Insured Depository Institution, A.K.A. Imperial Federal Savings Association

61 F.3d 725 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5900 , 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,130 Jack COHEN, on behalf of himself and all other similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, and Anthony Maniscalco, II, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION, in its capacity as receiver for Imperial Savings Association, an insured depository institution, a.k.a. Imperial Federal Savings Association, Defendant-Appellee. Jack COHEN, on behalf of himself and all other similarly situated; Mark Rozells, Plaintiffs-Appellees, and Michael Lea, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION, in its capacity as receiver for Imperial Savings Association, an insured depository institution, a.k.a. Imperial Federal Savings Association, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 94-55209, 94-55218. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 6, 1995. Decided July 28, 1995. Paul M. Mahoney, Jones, Mahoney & Brayton, Claremont, CA, for plaintiff-appellant Maniscalco. Peter K. Rosen, Rosen Law Firm, Los Angeles, CA, for plaintiff-appellant Lea. Jeffrey Ehrlich, Resolution Trust Corp., Washington, DC, for defendant-appellee. Joel L. Incorvaia and Anna M. Mueller, Incorvaia & Glancy, San…