Smolen

Amaco Enterprises, Inc. v. Smolen

Good Law
61 F.3d 909
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 17, 1995909California2,394 words

Opinion

Opinion

61 F.3d 909 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. AMACO ENTERPRISES INC., A California Corporation, Plaintiff, and Bruce R. MacLeod, State Bar No. 57647, Real-Party-in-Interest-Appellant, v. Joel SMOLEN, an individual; Deloitte, Haskins & Sells, a Partnership, Defendants-Appellees. AMACO ENTERPRISES INC., A California Corporation; Applied Molecular Technology Corp., A California Corporation; Vernal Amaro; Harvey Armstrong; Richard Cook and Leland McCarthy, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Joel SMOLEN, an individual; Deloitte, Haskins & Sells, a Partnership, Defendants-Appellees. CONSOLIDATED WESTWAY GROUP, INC., a Delaware Corporation; Westway Metals Corp., a Delaware Corporation; Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Joel SMOLEN, an individual; Deloitte, Haskins & Sells, a Partnership, Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 93-16746, 94-16269 and 94-16281. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 13, 1995. Decided July 17, 1995. Before: SCHROEDER,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.