County of San Diego v. Babbitt

61 F.3d 909 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, a political subdivision of the State of California, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bruce BABBITT, in his capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior; Eddie Frank Brown, in his official capacity as Assistant Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior; Woodrow Hopper, in his official capacity as Acting Commissioner of Indian Affairs, United States Bureau of Indian Affairs; Patrick Hayes, in his official capacity as Director, Office of Trust Responsibilities, United States Bureau of Indian Affairs; Ronald M. Jaeger, in his official capacity as Area Director of the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs; Campo Band of Mission Indians, a sovereign Indian tribal government; Muht-Hei, Inc., a corporation owned and chartered by the Campo Band of Mission Indians, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-55548. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted…